This is part 8 of a series on Who Am I?
Man’s Search For Meaning

Unearthed in Mesopotamia, in the ancient ruins of the communities of Sumer (3500-3000 BC), are the oldest written records still existing that have been discovered to date.
From these earliest times, humans have pondered earths mysteries, wondered about our existence, and if there is purpose in what we do each day?
We also have mused on life’s meaning, attempting to come up with answers. It was true in Sumer–it is true today.

It was learned that the people of this community worshiped the god “Utu” among other gods. Utu was the god of the Sun; representing justice, morality, and truth in their civilization. (1)
Gods and Deities
In Sumer, they created different gods to support these personal beliefs. This made sense of the world they knew and had to survive in. The people of Sumer had deified the powers of the natural forces of the world about them; creating names, images, and stories of gods to account for the processes they observed in nature.

Therefore, they worshipped these forces as gods, realizing their dependance upon them, such as the sun, moon, stars; the weather, the seasons— all supported as Deities, in support of their success in their personal survival and strived for happiness. They desperately relied upon the powers of nature in the growing of their crops, the fertility of their union, the success of their personal endeavors to prosper and survive. Believing these critical forces they relied on were controlled by gods – who could be prayed to and worshipped; helped the people have hope something was looking out for them and could be appealed to for help.
But there is another point here I think we can discover – and it also relates to our times.
Do we believe in God, merely because we think we need him? Or do we believe in God, because we see in the circumstances about us, something requiring an explanation?
Universal Constants
No matter what people might believe, this world is here, and it goes on. There is a science and a power behind it, regardless of how we choose to live our lives, or what we choose to believe. Our beliefs do not affect the truth of it in the least. The “Truth” (as we have discussed) “is what is”, whether we see it and attempt to understand it or not. Our science and knowledge are not responsible for and did not create the powers of the world or the universe. Our science, is our attempt to define, explain, and understand the life and the powers that were already here –and going on.
Even if we refuse to acknowledge, or ignore, or even lie about the truth of the reality behind the natural world; or try to deceive ourselves so we don’t have to recognize it; THE TRUTH OF THE POWER AND LAWS OF THE NATURAL WORLD AND UNIVERSE DO NOT REVOLVE AROUND US! IT IS WE WHO REVOLVE AROUND THEM!
This world and its natural forces and laws, and the life upon its surface was here before us. It is the reason we exist; and it will be here long after we are gone. If someone wants to know the “TRUTH OF EXISTENCE”, it is up to them to start from a point of honest questioning.
Thus far we have reasoned through the questions of science and the human experience, and even looked at some religious teaching that has helped define the foundations of who we might be? and what the truth of existence is? We have contrasted theistic and atheistic possibilities – to help discover logically and reasonably what the truth is. We have examined the question: If life comes from a creator or random chance? We have examined if life has meaning; or no meaning but what we make of it; or assign to it?
If we have learned one firm fact, or inescapable conclusion from the facts… it is that INTELLIGENT DESIGN WAS BEHIND OUR CREATION, and THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE on this unique planet we call earth.
But what about beyond the earth? Are there broader proofs in the universe?
Gravity and the Laws of Motion
Sir Isaac Newton was the central figure of science for the 17th century, and master of mathematically theory; inventor of calculus, and credited with the discovery of gravity and the laws of motion, which is only a partial list of his accomplishments. At the age of 23, he discovered the three laws of motion, Inertia, Force, Action & Reaction.
It is curious to me that he was spoken of during my elementary education as an atheist. Science, I was taught, is the abandonment of God for proper scientific reasoning. Today, as the greater body of Newton’s work has come to light to be better known, those claims are refuted. Today, as more people have educated themselves, and Newton’s full body of work has been reexamined, it is clear he was no atheist.

Newton believed in an active, and personally involved Creator. Newton had well-formed views on the subject of man’s origins.
In his work, Principia, Newton addresses his beliefs on the creation of the universe:
“This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being….This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all; and on account of his dominion he is wont to be called Lord God…or Universal Ruler” (2) -Sir Isaac Newton
Why would Newton say this, if “natural science” is as Modern Science claims, a refutation on God? It is because Newton was not conditioned to begin his scientific studies with his mind already made up about Gods existence. He was willing to let the facts he was uncovering speak for themselves.
Modern Science today has no interest in supporting truth, but it has proved it is the exact opposite. It has been put in place to support an agenda, which is anti-God. We have let those facts speak for themselves. Whenever the true science, as we have been able to demonstrate, supports intelligent design –it is ignored and covered up. Professors won’t even go there, and entertain such a discussion. By not acknowledging these points of truth, they turn science into a political tool in support of atheism, not truth.
Newton’s advance mind impacted the world in his time, with discoveries and conclusions of which still hold up today, as they are at the heart of true scientific mathematical relevance and theory. In his works on gravity and the laws of motion, he saw in all of this: order, and deliberate intelligent design behind the universe.
Living also before Charles Darwin, Newton knew the arguments for a self-existent universe which Darwin was to embrace; but rejected them.
“Blind metaphysical necessity [materials and energy that make up the universe], which is certainly the same always and every where, could produce no variety of things. All that diversity of natural things which we find suited to different times and places could arise from nothing but the ideas and will of a Being, necessarily existing.” (3) –Sir Isaac Newton
It was clearly Newton’s belief, that metaphysical necessity (things of and pertaining to life’s existence and the nature of reality,) required intelligence as the “cause” of ordered things. That a blind guide– such as a self-existent force, lacking intelligence or awareness and intellectual capacity, could not produce the variety of life we find in the world, or produce the order of the universe.
Newton found that there was order in the movement of Bodies in space, and their movements were exacting and predictable in mathematical calculations. This did not support a chaotic system of abstract confusion, and mere chance. It was evidence that some power had taken the chaos and ordered it into balance, and structured harmony. As if for a purpose!
Mathematics are deliberate, and sequential; the exact opposite of chaos. For these basic cosmic materials to come into a state of order, and to be constructed into “a variety of things” as Newton calls them, they must reasonably have been acted on by intelligent processes to be ordered into different more complex forms “suited to different times and places”.
Similarly, the raw materials of this earth will remain in their natural state– unless acted on by intelligent humans. It requires an intelligent being to turn clay into pottery, metal ore into tools shaped for our use; wood into homes and furniture; or animal skins into a belt to hold up our pants, or shoes for our feet. As I have pointed out earlier: our modern-day cars, cell phones, and all intelligent inventions are evidence of intelligent life. Scientists themselves would declare this so, and they do!
Similarly, Newton suggests, I find order and deliberate mathematical theory of sequential precise measurements and events, in the heavens. These systems of order in the heavens can be marked by mathematical calculations. The earth, in particular, needed this consistency to function as it does to produce its ordered seasons, like clockwork each yearly cycle, as it revolves around the sun providing a stable atmosphere so life can exist, and even thrive.
The moon, in its exact size, shape, and precise distance from earth, provides a miraculous counterweight to the sun, helping the earth maintain a consistent speed and distance from the sun, as it helps to support and cradled it. Keeping earth from being overpowered and drawn closer to the sun, or preventing earth in being overcome by the suns gravitational pull, which could cause the earth to wander into a wobble in its rotation, drifting away from the consistency of its centered equator, and effecting our polar regions to change their axis center, creating violent weather conditions on earth. (4) (5)

It is also significant earth has only one moon, unlike other planets. Multiple moons or even two in conflicting orbits, could have pulled earth off this delicate counterbalance, preventing or destroying any life here. Another item in the list of lucky coincidences that just happened to take place so this earth could function properly and work the way it must- to support life. This lengthy list of necessary coincidences just keeps growing and growing – as our science advances.
Our Moon, like so many other needed specific requirements for life existence, turned out to be the exact size, distance, and orbit as a companion to earth, to make it a hospitable place to allow and support abundant life.
It takes intelligence to produce intelligent things. Mathematics and mathematical formulas come out of reason and intelligence, and a consistent process that is guided by a superior intellect. Complex diversity: which life is, could only be explained by “a Being necessarily existing”, with deliberate intent to take control of inanimate things and order (organize) them to become animate. This cosmic order in Newton’s mind, denotes a creator on a much grander scale.
“It is the dominion [the control over the universe and its properties] of a spiritual being which constitutes a God… And from his true dominion it follows that the true God is a Living, Intelligent, and Powerful Being; and, from his other perfections, that he is Supreme or most Perfect.
He is Eternal and Infinite, Omnipotent and Omniscient; that is, his duration reaches from Eternity to Eternity; his presence from Infinity to Infinity; he governs all things, and knows all things that are or can be done… he constitutes Duration and Space.” (6) –Isaac Newton
The Laws of Relativity
Generations later came Albert Einstein. Spoken of today as an atheist among the scientific circles, but Einstein, himself, declared he was no Atheist.
“There is harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, yet there are people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me to support such views.” (7) –Albert Einstein

Einstein did not embrace belief in a personal God, who was actively involved in our daily lives. He felt organized religion was not based in sound science. He saw God more as an intelligent energy and Spiritual substance. His statements in this regard, is what atheist’s use to claim- he too- was an atheist.
“I believe in Spinoza’s God, who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings.” (8)
Einstein found his religious philosophy most closely connected to the views of Spinoza.
Baruch (de) Spinoza lived from 1632 –1677. He was a Dutch philosopher living in Amsterdam, Holland, and is considered one of the great thinkers of the Enlightenment period.
“We must, indeed, all expel anthropomorphic representation of the divine.” (9)
–Baruch Spinoza
Anthropomorphism is the act of assigning or suggesting the characteristics of humans to an animal, a god or an inanimate thing. (10)
This is what Einstein felt was the issue with organized religion, in assigning human concepts to the infinite. Spinoza’s belief that this was inappropriate, was closer to Einstein’s concept of what God would be, a non-human entity. And that we as humans, looking at our own needs, insecurities, and thoughts– have passed them onto the Divine nature of God. That this tendency is reflected in religious development and thought down through the centuries as humans have expanded the traits and characteristics of God to include our own native reality as beings.
In this fashion, he spoke many times of God as a Spiritual Being he believed existed; which was the power behind the universe, but not necessarily a force directly tuned in and connected to human existentialism, (those issues we face in the course of our existence).
He believed a supernatural power or spirit must permeate space and time, for he saw evidences of order and mathematical certainty within these universal laws.
“Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe – a spirit vastly superior to that of man.” (11)
–Albert Einstein
He believed the only explanation for such complexity – was an intelligent force, far more advanced than humanity; which explained the harmony in the things he discovered related to physics, and the reason behind such a calculated broad universal creation.
“In this universe, there are countless planets, and each of them follows an orbit while revolving around their axis. God reveals Himself in the orderly manner of what exists!” (12)
-Albert Einstein

In his discoveries, he had a similar awakening to what Newton had, that there is order in natural planetary law. In his Theory of Relativity and Quantum Light Theory he was able to mathematical calculate his beliefs before he could prove them. He felt this was proof that universal creation was the outcome of intelligence in operation throughout the universe.
“We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations.” (13) –Albert Einstein
Einstein did not see a conflict between science and a belief in God; he saw it as an informational gap, needing to filled. That science only lacked the development to comprehend and provide an explanation for Gods power and abilities.
“… Science today cannot prove the existence of God, because science is not yet developed enough, it is not because God does not exist.” (14) –Albert Einstein
Although Einstein saw fallacy in organized religion, he also believed it held merit for mankind; and did push the human race towards a higher sense of personal morality and integrity. He particularly pointed out the virtues of the Judea-Christian religious philosophy.
“The highest principles for our aspirations and judgments are given to us in the Jewish-Christian religious tradition. It is a very high goal which, with our weak powers, we can reach only very inadequately, but which gives a sure foundation to our aspirations and valuations.” (15)
– Albert Einstein
It is clear, Einstein believed there was no other reasonable or logical conclusion to explain what we see in the universe; and which can account for things we witness on display–except in the handiwork and intellect of an all-powerful God. That any scientist who would look upon such things (and was being honest), could not reason otherwise.
“Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe – a spirit vastly superior to that of man.” (16) – Albert Einstein
That is what our most celebrated Scientist of the 20th Century declared; and that evidence still stands today as well as his own testimony to it!
Creator, and the Creation
As a part of learning and comprehending existence, and to comprehend that which we find around us in this world, it is necessary to understand two states of condition. The relationship between the Creator and the Creation.

What is the Creator?
The Creator is a self-functioning independent intelligent force; capable of reason, comprehension, knowledge retention, assessment, problem solving, construction, experimentation, improvement, planning, and execution. The Creator does not rely on any outside influence to exist or create. The Creator is self-contained, self-sustaining; and can direct external materials and forces to its will.
What is the Creation?
The Creation is the outcome of the will and skill of the Creator. It is not self-sustaining, it is not self-functioning, unless the creator has made it so; for it is not a work of itself– but of the creator who designed and created it. It is not capable of building itself, or replacing its missing parts, because it cannot operate beyond its design and level of capacity or intelligence. It can only do what it was designed to do, for it does not have life in itself. Without the Creator, it would not exist, and it cannot continue once it has run down, and its parts cease to function.
If you attempt to examine the creation, and attempt to understand its working parts, systems, and function, (being an intelligence creature yourself) you may be able to notice and discover much it is capable of. But when it comes to duplicating it, we have run up against an impassible wall. Billions of complex parts that were carefully engineered and that work together in a way our limited science has not been able to repeat or replicate. It is too far beyond us.
To explain how it came into being, you must credit the creator who created it; for with millions of years of speculated human existence, accumulated knowledge and growth, we still are only scratching the surface of its complexity. Yet those who lead our science community still want to believe this was the outcome of chance forces coming together. In an attempt to explain the unexplainable, they have assigned to a word “evolution” the powers of a supreme creator.
“It is important to note that the information written on DNA molecules is not produced by any known natural interaction of matter. Matter and molecules have no innate intelligence, allowing self organization into codes. There are no known physical laws which give molecules a natural tendency to arrange themselves into such coded structures.” (17)
As is demonstrated here by Hubert Yockey, a Ph.D. in Physics, DNA molecules and matter alone cannot explain life. Their order of arrangement is not a natural occurring phenomenon. They do not have the capability in themselves to exist. They follow a complex program placed withing them they did not create. Some external power and influence outside of them is the only explanation for their existence.
Yet Modern Science has wished to suggest a concept called “Evolution” created all life. Evolution is merely a word. It is not a system, an intelligence, or a factory that can organize or create anything. It has no creative powers, and no intellectual capacity. It is a word, meant to encompass a system, based in a theory, that we know with modern science has been proven false, and cannot explain life. How did the DNA get its information? How was matter organized? WE DON’T KNOW! DNA has shown us the miracle of life, but not the method of how it was actually accomplished.
“That organic evolution could account for the complex forms of life in the past and the present has long since been abandoned by men who grasp the importance of the DNA genetic code.” (18)
– Dr. John J. Grebe
Grebe firmly makes the point, once the DNA had been discovered, and genetic engineering was found to be behind how life was constructed, Darwin’s organic evolution was proved to be outdated and a fraud. It has no explanation for a logical system that could produce DNA.
To look to the creation for all the answers, when you find a level of intelligence involved that far exceeds your own, shows a complete lack of understanding or admission of the facts.
The creation can only yield the sum total of what it is, what it does, and what it was designed to be. All life therefore eventually dies, and can only exist within the limitations of its design. We can leave the creation (planet earth) and enter space in our space crafts, but we must return or die. To find these perfect and precise conditions of biological existence– we would need to look for another carefully constructed world; operating on these same principles of creation. So far this has been impossible to find.
We should all stand humbled by these facts, and desire to understand that Creator; to who’s eminent power we owe our very existence.
These truths were not lost on Albert Einstein, who said:
“My religiosity consists of a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit, …That superior reasoning power forms my idea of God.” (19)
“My God created laws… His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking but by immutable laws.” (20)
We all have the capacity within ourselves to be creators on a simpler scale. We learn by our own discovery what it takes to create. That a level of experimentation, acquired intelligence, and skill is needed in the long process behind our earthly creations. Once this creative process has yielded a successful result, we can realize by our own intellect and experience that things just don’t magically create themselves.
Dr. Michael Denton shares:
“The complexity of the simplest known type of cell is so great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could have been thrown together suddenly by some kind of freakish, vastly improbable, event. Such an occurrence would be indistinguishable from a miracle.” (21)
Famed researcher and astronomer Fred Hoyle was credited with saying:
“Supposing the first [organic] cell originated by chance, is like believing a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.” (22)
Sir Isaac Newton credited the existence of the universe as only being explainable, through the operations and involvement of a superior creator acting on his creation:
“This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being” (23)

Both Newton and Einstein, and many other men of education and science, could see this truth— and have declared it. And understood they were observing the workings and science of a God with capacity far beyond them, who used logic and reason in the creation.
“There is an author which transcends the material and the matter of which these [DNA] strands are made. The author first of all conceived the information necessary to make a cell, then wrote it down, and then fixed in it a mechanism of reading it and realizing it in practice so that the cell builds itself from the information…” (24) –Chemist, Dr. Wilder-Smith
The relationship of Creator and Creation is as basic as existence itself. It is at the foundations of this world, and the known universe.
When we talk of human kind, and what man has created, we don’t get confused about the relationship of Creator and Creation. We look at man and his intelligence, and we look at the creation of man –and there is no comparison. The one could not exist without the other.
We would not look for the truth or answers in the study of the creations of man alone, to learn how they were constructed. We would also study the method, science, and technology humans developed and invented to build their creations. This is the whole purpose we have Universities and Trade schools and Apprenticeships; to pass on the knowledge of how to create. We would never be able to figure out how to make a cell phone or an automobile simply by suggesting they created themselves, and looking to find a way to explain how they put themselves together. We know that would be a foolish concept. But when it comes to ourselves or the biological creation, and the universe– suddenly Modern Scientists use different reasoning, and want to ignore the clear intelligence and complexity of biological life. Those currently educated and who we have hired and tasked to fill the seats of higher learning suddenly become blind to these facts; and spend endless time and money chasing an impossibility. They live in a lie of their own making to avoid giving credit to the Creator.
Why? Because they are not interested in proving Gods existence. They want to be in the place of god, making all decisions and living life with no restrains over what they can or cannot do. No moral fetters to require an expectation of them to obey laws and commandments that will restrict the way they wish to believe and live. They want to shape society to live within their illusion, and keep us supporting a system that worships and follows them.
We are all free to believe what we wish. The mind is free to believe. But the facts of what we know, show the argument and reason behind this existence stands on immutable laws and science—which we are but learning. Yet this knowledge and power was being wielded in the universe before we, or this earth and solar system, were ever conceived.
We are but a creation, of a creator we are trying to understand.
To be continued . . .
_______________________________________________
Sources:
1. Utu, Wikipedia, (as of June 8, 2021) Utu – Wikipedia [Under Ancient First Writing]
2. Christine Dao, Man of Science, Man of God: Isaac Newton ;Newton’s Principia: The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy; Institute for Creation Research Website: http://www.icr.org/article/3859/
3. Christine Dao, Man of Science, Man of God: Isaac Newton ;Newton’s Principia: The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy; Institute for Creation Research Website: http://www.icr.org/article/3859/
4. NASA Website Earth’s Moon, Overview | Earth’s Moon – NASA Solar System Exploration
6. Sir Isaac Newton, Principia Mathematica, 1687
7.Did Einstein Believe in God? – bethinking.org Einstein in a conversation with Hubertus zu Löwenstein, in Löwenstein’s book Towards the Further Shore (London Victor Gollancz 1968), p.156
8. Did Einstein Believe in God? – bethinking.org In 1929, Einstein was asked by Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein whether he believed in God. Einstein responded by telegram.
9. Spinoza’s Philosophy Summary (the-philosophy.com)
10. www.yourdictionary.com/anthropomorphism
11. Did Einstein Believe in God? – bethinking.org Quoted in H. Dukas and B. Hoffman, Albert Einstein – The Human Side (USA Princeton University Press 1981)
12. God Existence According to Albert Einstein, https://thebl.tv/culture/gods-existence-according-to-albert-einstein-and-his-last-wish.html
13. What Einstein thought about God, the Universe, science and religion (zmescience.com)
14. God Existence According to Albert Einstein, https://thebl.tv/culture/gods-existence-according-to-albert-einstein-and-his-last-wish.html
15. This article appears in Einstein’s Ideas and Opinions, pp.41 – 49. The first section is taken from an address at Princeton Theological Seminary, May 19, 1939. It was published in Out of My Later Years, New York: Philosophical Library, 1950. New York Times Article
16. Did Einstein Believe in God? – bethinking.org Quoted in H. Dukas and B. Hoffman, Albert Einstein – The Human Side (USA Princeton University Press 1981)
17. Hubert P. Yockey, “Self Organization Origin of Life Scenarios and Information Theory,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 91, No. 1 (July 7, 1981), p. 13.
18. Dr. John J. Grebe, physicist, “DNA Complexity Points to Divine Design,” Science & Scripture, Vol. 3, No. 3 (San Diego: Creation-Science Research Center, 1973), p. 20 (p. 20 “No scientific evidence has shown the slightest chance of one code mutating to another.”). ORIGIN OF LIFE—Does evolutionism supply the answers? – ChristianAnswers.Net
19. Albert Einstein, The Quotable Einstein, ed. Alice Calaprice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), pp.195-6. https://www.bethinking.org/god/did-einstein-believe-in-god
20. Einstein in conversation with W. Hermann in Hermann’s book Einstein and the Poet (USA Branden Press, 1983), p.132; https://www.bethinking.org/god/did-einstein-believe-in-god
21. Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (Bethesda, Maryland: Adler and Adler Publishers, 1986), p. 264.
https://www.bethinking.org/god/did-einstein-believe-in-god
22. “Hoyle on Evolution,” Nature, Vol. 294, No. 5837 (November 12, 1981), p. 105.
https://www.bethinking.org/god/did-einstein-believe-in-god
23. Christine Dao, Man of Science, Man of God: Isaac Newton ;Newton’s Principia: The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy; Institute for Creation Research Website: http://www.icr.org/article/3859/
24. Arthur E. Wilder-Smith in Willem J.J. Glashouwer and Paul S. Taylor, The Origin of Life (PO Box 1167, Marysville WA 98270-1167, USA: Eden Films and Standard Media, 1983) (Creationist motion picture).



